Cybersecurity
The full domain, and the other capabilities within it.
Design and enforce the boundaries inside your network, not only at its edge.
Network security here means deciding what may talk to what, proving that decision is enforced, and seeing it when something tries anyway. It covers the firewall estate, the segmentation model behind it, remote access, and the detection layer that watches east-west traffic rather than only the perimeter.
Most networks we are asked to look at were flat when they were built and have been patched toward segmentation since. The work is usually less about new appliances than about a policy model somebody can explain, apply consistently, and change without an outage.
If more than one of these is true, this is usually the right place to start.
| Deliverable | What it contains |
|---|---|
| Segmentation model | Zone map, trust boundaries, and the allowed flows between them — written so it can be reviewed by someone who was not in the room. |
| Firewall policy design | Rule structure, naming, change process, and a cleanup plan for the existing rulebase with each removal justified. |
| Detection and telemetry plan | What is collected, from where, at what volume, and which detections it is meant to support. |
| Migration runbook | Sequenced cutover with rollback at each step, maintenance windows, and the tests that decide whether a step holds. |
A reference, not a template. Your estate decides which parts apply and in what order they arrive.
Targets are agreed with you before the work starts, and reported against for its duration.
Usually not. Most of the value is in the policy model and the segmentation behind it, both of which are portable across vendors. We would only recommend replacement where a platform cannot enforce the design — for example where application-aware policy or inspection at the needed throughput is not available.
It is the part that carries real risk, which is why it is sequenced rather than switched on. Zones are introduced in monitor mode first, so you see what would have been blocked before anything is. Enforcement follows zone by zone, each with a tested rollback.
No. It is a design principle: access is granted per session, per application, on the basis of verified identity and device posture, rather than by position on the network. Products implement parts of it. Buying one without the design gets you a VPN with a new name.
This capability builds the controls and the telemetry. A SOC watches the telemetry and responds. They are designed together — detections are only as good as the data the network gives them — and they can be delivered together as a managed service.
Yes, and that is the normal case. The telemetry plan is written against whatever platform you already own, including the licensing consequence of the volume it will add, because that is where these projects usually get expensive without warning.
A review and segmentation design for a single site is typically measured in weeks, not months. Enforcement across a multi-site estate is longer and is deliberately staged. We would rather give you a dated plan after the review than a number before it.
The full domain, and the other capabilities within it.
EDR deployment, detection engineering and automated containment across endpoints, servers and identities — tuned to your estate, not to a vendor demo.
Posture management, workload protection and entitlement control for AWS, Azure and GCP — with misconfiguration caught in the pipeline, not in production.
The fastest way to a useful answer is a short, scoped look at what you already have.